The world's first weblog devoted to military justice and military law issues.
Monday, August 29, 2005
NATIONAL NEWSPAPERS - 30 AUG 05
From the NY Times, Air Force Bans Leaders' Promotion of Religion:
Also from the Times, Ruling on Detainees' Identities ("A federal judge ordered the Pentagon to ask the prisoners in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, if they objected to having their identities disclosed. The decision, by Judge Jed S. Rakoff in Federal District Court in Manhattan, came in a lawsuit filed April 19 by The Associated Press under the Freedom of Information Act. In response, the Pentagon released transcripts of tribunals held at Guantánamo in late 2004 to determine whether all the detainees were correctly classified as enemy combatants, as military officials maintained. The Pentagon blacked out the prisoners' names, arguing that publishing them would violate their privacy and could expose them and their families to reprisals.").

Former Air Force Academy Chaplain Melinda S. Morton, Removed From Her Post After Criticizing the Religious Climate at the Academy (AP)
From the Washington Post, Military Wrestles With Disharmony Among Chaplains:

Former Army Chaplain Rabbi Jeffrey Goldman, Deserter or Persecution Victim? (WaPo)
In a related story from the Post, Army, Rabbi at Odds Over Departure:
As you might have expected, USA Today pretty much missed the boat on this story, except for a little blurb in Nationline.
Categories: Air+Force+Academy, Religious+Discrimination, AWOL, Guantanamo, Newspapers
The Air Force issued new religion guidelines to its commanders on Monday that caution against promoting any particular faith - or even "the idea of religion over nonreligion" - in official communications or functions like meetings, sports events and ceremonies.ANALYSIS: The interim guidelines are posted on the Air Force site. Some of the provisions critics are most likely to examine:
The guidelines discourage public prayers at official Air Force events or meetings other than worship services, one of the most contentious issues for many commanders. But they allow for "a brief nonsectarian prayer" at special ceremonies like those honoring promotions, or in "extraordinary circumstances" like "mass casualties, preparation for imminent combat and natural disasters."
The Air Force developed the guidelines after complaints from cadets at the Air Force Academy in Colorado Springs that evangelical Christians leaders were using their positions to promote their faith.
The guidelines apply not just to the academy, but also to the entire Air Force. They will be made final later this year after Air Force generals meet and consider recommendations from their commanders.
B. PUBLIC PRAYER OUTSIDE OF VOLUNTARY WORSHIP SETTINGS.Now, maybe I was just asleep for four years when I went to West Point, but I thought these were already the rules. Did Air Force leaders really believe they were allowed to have prayer during class, or openly praise Jesus during a military class? I never experienced anything like what has been alleged in news reports or what these "new" rules seem to suggest.
(1) PUBLIC PRAYER SHOULD NOT USUALLY BE INCLUDED IN OFFICIAL SETTINGS SUCH AS STAFF MEETINGS, OFFICE MEETINGS, CLASSES, OR OFFICIALLY SANCTIONED ACTIVITIES SUCH AS SPORTS EVENTS OR PRACTICE SESSIONS.
(2) COMMON SENSE--AND MUTUAL RESPECT--SHOULD ALWAYS BE APPLIED AND EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES MAY DRIVE EXCEPTIONS. (NOTE: For example, there may be extraordinary circumstances where the potential benefits for the welfare of the command outweigh the potential of causing discomfort. These circumstances might include mass casualties, preparation for imminent combat, and natural disasters.)
(3) CONSISTENT WITH LONG-STANDING MILITARY TRADITION, A BRIEF NONSECTARIAN PRAYER MAY BE INCLUDED IN NON-ROUTINE MILITARY CEREMONIES OR EVENTS OF SPECIAL IMPORTANCE, SUCH AS A CHANGE-OFCOMMAND, PROMOTION CEREMONIES OR SIGNIFICANT CELEBRATIONS, WHERE THE PURPOSE OF THE PRAYER IS TO ADD A HEIGHTENED SENSE OF SERIOUSNESS OR SOLEMNITY, NOT TO ADVANCE SPECIFIC RELIGIOUS BELIEFS. MILITARY CHAPLAINS ARE TRAINED TO DEAL WITH SUCH EVENTS.
(4) IN ADDITION, A MOMENT OF SILENCE FOR PERSONAL REFLECTION DOES NOT REQUIRE THE SAME CONSIDERATIONS AS PUBLIC PRAYER AND MAY BE APPROPRIATE IN OFFICIAL SETTINGS.
C. INDIVIDUAL SHARING OF RELIGIOUS FAITH.
(1) IN OFFICIAL CIRCUMSTANCES, PARTICULARLY SITUATIONS WHERE SUPERIOR/SUBORDINATE RELATIONSHIPS ARE INVOLVED, INDIVIDUALS NEED TO BE SENSITIVE TO THE POTENTIAL THAT PERSONAL EXPRESSIONS MAY APPEAR TO BE OFFICIAL EXPRESSIONS. THIS IS ESPECIALLY TRUE WHEN SUBORDINATES ARE PRESENT AS PART OF THEIR OFFICIAL DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS.
(2) THE MORE SENIOR THE INDIVIDUAL, THE MORE LIKELY THAT PERSONAL EXPRESSIONS MAY BE PERCEIVED TO BE OFFICIAL STATEMENTS. THE MORE SENIOR THE LEADER, THE MORE RESPONSIBILITY HE OR SHE HAS TO SEND THE MESSAGE THAT WE ARE A TEAM BASED ON TRUST, RESPECT, AND A COMMON MISSION TO DEFEND OUR NATION AND THAT WHAT IS EXPECTED OF ALL OUR PERSONNEL IS TO LIVE UP TO OUR OATHS, EMBRACE OUR SHARED AIR FORCE CORE VALUES, AND DO OUR DUTY.
(3) NOTHING IN THIS GUIDANCE SHOULD BE UNDERSTOOD TO LIMIT VOLUNTARY, PEER TO PEER DISCUSSIONS.
Also from the Times, Ruling on Detainees' Identities ("A federal judge ordered the Pentagon to ask the prisoners in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, if they objected to having their identities disclosed. The decision, by Judge Jed S. Rakoff in Federal District Court in Manhattan, came in a lawsuit filed April 19 by The Associated Press under the Freedom of Information Act. In response, the Pentagon released transcripts of tribunals held at Guantánamo in late 2004 to determine whether all the detainees were correctly classified as enemy combatants, as military officials maintained. The Pentagon blacked out the prisoners' names, arguing that publishing them would violate their privacy and could expose them and their families to reprisals.").

Former Air Force Academy Chaplain Melinda S. Morton, Removed From Her Post After Criticizing the Religious Climate at the Academy (AP)
From the Washington Post, Military Wrestles With Disharmony Among Chaplains:
The growing influence of evangelical Protestants is roiling the military chaplain corps, where their desire to preach their faith more openly is colliding with long-held military traditions of pluralism and diversity.
After accusations this summer that evangelical chaplains, faculty and coaches were pressuring cadets at the Air Force Academy, the Air Force yesterday issued new guidelines on respect for religious minorities. In the Navy, evangelical Protestant chaplains are fighting what they say is a legacy of discrimination in hiring and promotions, and they are bridling at suggestions they not pray publicly "in the name of Jesus."
Much of the conflict is in two areas that, until now, have been nearly invisible to civilians: how the military hires its ministers and how they word their public prayers. Evangelical chaplains -- who are rising in numbers and clout amid a decline in Catholic priests and mainline Protestant ministers -- are challenging the status quo on both questions, causing even some evangelical commanders to worry about the impact on morale.
"There is a polarization that is beginning to set up that I don't think is helpful. Us versus them," said Air Force Col. Richard K. Hum, an Evangelical Free Church minister who is the executive director of the Armed Forces Chaplains Board. "I don't know whether it's an overflow of what's happening in society. But this sort of thing is so detrimental to what we are trying to do in the chaplaincy."
The Rev. MeLinda S. Morton, a Lutheran minister who resigned in June as an Air Force chaplain after criticizing the religious atmosphere at the Air Force Academy, said there has been a palpable rise in evangelical fervor not just among chaplains but also among the officer corps in general since she joined the military in 1982, originally as a launch officer in a nuclear missile silo.
"When we were coneheads -- missile officers -- I would never, ever have engaged in conversations with subordinates aligning my power and position as an officer with my views on faith matters," she said. Today, "I've heard of people being made incredibly uncomfortable by certain wing commanders who engage in sectarian devotions at staff meetings."

Former Army Chaplain Rabbi Jeffrey Goldman, Deserter or Persecution Victim? (WaPo)
In a related story from the Post, Army, Rabbi at Odds Over Departure:
The U.S. Army has listed Rabbi Jeffrey Goldman as a deserter, making him subject to arrest if he returns to the United States. But he maintains that he was driven out of the military chaplaincy by anti-Semitic harassment from Christian colleagues.Also from the Post, Air Force Sets Rules Limiting Religious Expression.
Goldman, 33, left Fort Stewart, Ga., in January 2002 to return to his native Canada after just one year as an Orthodox Jewish military chaplain. He said that he believes he resigned legally from the Army and that the desertion charge was a vindictive response to his allegations.
Rabbi Jeffrey Goldman says he was harassed in the Army. (Douglas Struck - Twp)
While he was posted at the Georgia base, Goldman said, he worked in a "poisonous atmosphere" created by three Christian chaplains. One of the men taunted him by displaying Nazi guard uniforms, he said. His supervising chaplain told him, "Rabbi, if you want to survive down here, this is the South, and you'd better forget you are a [expletive] Yankee rabbi from up north," Goldman said.
As you might have expected, USA Today pretty much missed the boat on this story, except for a little blurb in Nationline.
Categories: Air+Force+Academy, Religious+Discrimination, AWOL, Guantanamo, Newspapers
JAG CENTRAL